Pat Robertson’s Veil

Let’s take a little journey through Pat Robertson’s mind in the wake of his prophetic proclamation of a Trump reelection, war involving Israel, peace for awhile, followed by an asteroid strike, and then the end of everything. Even for Pat, this is a stretch, and I’ve heard from friends that say “he needs to get off the air.”

As if that would ever happen.

Pat “sees” things through a complex but reliable veil, that he and his ilk are the Biblical “sons of Issachar, men with knowledge of the times.” However, that veil includes Republican Party talking points, because Pat is first a politician, secondly a television preacher of some acclaim. He feels, as an apostle for the current times, that he can interpret and proclaim by clipping together various parts of the Bible to create — as Disney used to say — the plausible impossible when it comes to commentary on current events. This was the entire basis for the work we did in the early 80s in developing a propaganda-based narrative that we alone could see and therefore “interpret and report” as a news organization. We were “TV Journalism With A Different Spirit.”

I can tell you from experience that he is being quite sincere in that this Trump/asteroid scenario is the only one that works vis-a-vis his veil. After all, he’s talking about God, his view of God orchestrating everything, so that it “makes sense” to him and his followers.

It ought to scare the crap out of Americans that a man like this has the ear of the President of the United States.

These proclamations from the mountain top were a regular feature of my daily life as Executive Producer of The 700 Club in the early and mid 80s. In 1984, for example, he looked downstream and prophesied “deep darkness and trouble” for America “towards the end of the year.” And what was happening at the end of the year? Ronald Reagan was running for reelection.

This era of evangelical messaging about the end times began in 1948 with the return of the Jews to the Holy Land through the political movement known as Zionism. Through Pat’s veil, this could mean only one thing: that God was preparing the world for the return of Jesus Christ. Hence, the relentless pounding the self-centered message of salvation to everybody and the creation of a set of evangelical rules that demanded Christians participate or run the risk of losing their salvation and be damned for eternity.

It’s a powerful manipulator of good people and not-so-good people.

So, what are we to do?

Pat was quick to point out the words of Jesus, who said in Matthew 24 that no human will ever know the date and the hour that the end comes. Pat glossed over it in acknowledging that he could be wrong. But here’s the thing. God isn’t stupid. Life knows that it has to be so in order to prevent the self-centered manipulation that would likely come out of letting anybody in on the secret.

Evangelical Christianity of the sort practiced by Pat Robertson and his clan is doing exactly that politically. Christians fearful of going to hell simply pass along what they’ve been told, because the threat against them is that they’ll miss out on all the fun associated with the Rapture and smiling at their “unbelieving” friends as they pass them by on their way to Heaven.

Thus, the message is one of well-produced superstition and unprovable proclamations, all stemming from a man who himself wanted to be President. I was at the meeting in the board room of CBN where Pat first told us he was running. He said that God had told him to run and that he would win. It was the only possible “Biblical” conclusion to what he was being “told”, right?

Once again, Pat is counting on his “gifts” to guide a narrative that makes sense to him but challenges those who still are able to think for themselves.

Christianity has its own God/man to stand between believers and a vengeful God in order to prevent his Father from destroying everything. At least that’s what we’re taught.

His name is Jesus Christ, not Pat Robertson.

New Final Chapter From My Book

When the publisher of The Gospel of Self wanted to distribute my book via Counterpoint Press, I was asked to re-write a final chapter more appropriate to the new subtitle: “How Pat Robertson Stole the Soul of the GOP.” Since many of you bought the earlier version, I wanted to share that new chapter with you today. Enjoy

PAT ROBERTSON TODAY

When Pat Robertson interviewed Donald Trump for The 700 Club in July of 2017, the press turned it into a pretty big deal. After all, the President didn’t do sit-down interviews, and while Pat was clearly in Trump’s camp, the press was still trying to figure out how he’d been elected in the first place, so there were hopes that the interview would generate news.  

The Huffington Post asked me to write a piece1 for publication the day after the interview, and the headline they chose was that there was nothing surprising: 

Pat was clearly very much in sync with Trump’s entire vision and government and predicted that he would be easily re-elected if he is able to get health care and taxation under control. He reminded the President that thousands and thousands of Christians are praying for him and will continue to do so. 

Nothing presented here today was surprising or revealing, but it was a strong reminder of how far to the right we’ve moved as a country. Pat Robertson was and always will be a representative of the aristocrats, and he views life through that lens. As such, he has made the beliefs of the ruling class the beliefs of the Gospel of Self, which is a living, breathing dream for the politically conservative. That those farther down the economic scale fully trust their “masters” is the single greatest cultural feat accomplished in the last 100 years or more, and it perplexes those who rely on education and reason. This is why I called the interview today “an important cultural moment,” for if the observers continue to ignore this happening, more surprises will be in store at the polling places of America. 

Pat Robertson’s vision includes building an Evangelical Christian “shadow government” that will eventually take over when the left completely fails. In Donald Trump, Pat has found his leader. 

This wasn’t an interview; it was a reverential hand job. 

Pat Robertson’s view of America under a God-appointed leader requires a willingness to step outside certain realities to embrace, and yet that’s exactly what’s happened since Donald Trump was elected. Evangelicals must force themselves to look the other way, as revelation after revelation about his personal life, false narratives, and management style become clear, and this seems to happen almost daily. Support him they do, and in words and ways that we cannot dismiss, for Pat’s “shadow government” seems to now be coming out into the light. 

President Trump’s highly controversial summit with Valdimir Putin in Helsinki during the summer of 2018 was bashed by Democrats and Republicans alike, but it was Pat Robertson – during that same interview a year earlier – who gave his blessing to the President’s fondness for the former Soviet Union. Here’s the way The Atlantic reporter Vann Newkirk put it after the interview. The article was headlined “Pat Robertson Finally Gives Up On Russia2

Robertson didn’t push Trump at all. There were no questions about evil Russian plots, and relatively few references to nuclear war. He accepted the president’s answers without any serious challenge. 

…If Pat Robertson says Russia isn’t a problem, then it won’t be for thousands of his evangelical followers. A good portion of Trump’s base—and perhaps even some religious folks outside the base who keep up with the 700 Club—might be persuaded that Russia is a non-issue by Robertson’s acceptance. And not only did Robertson accept Trump’s answers, he gave them his blessing as only a televangelist minister could, telling the president that “I want you to know there are thousands of people praying for you and holding you up all the time.” 

The astonishment over this is fully justified, because when I was Pat’s producer, the USSR was evil personified. Russia is widely regarded as the most significant opponent of Israel during the end times of which Pat preached often. He never had anything good to say about the Soviets, so his capitulation to Trump on the subject is highly noteworthy and speaks to the lengths that white evangelicals will go to support their man. 

According to studies by both Gallup3 and Pew4, Republican support for Russia has doubled over the past few years. Ronald Reagan, who tagged the Soviets as “The Evil Empire,” and this pro-Russia activity would not have gone over well with him. This is remarkable, because Pat Robertson loved Ronald Reagan and viewed himself as advancing the Reagan legacy in his 1988 run for President. This is apparently not the case anymore, so long as Pat can have his conservative judges, Israel, and religious freedom. 

And now, with the President’s saber-rattling over a possible war with Iran, these same Christians will again be giving him their complete support. Iran is seen as Israel’s top enemy in the Middle East and represents Biblical Persia in terms of end times prophecy. One of the biggest problems Evangelicals had with Barack Obama was his efforts to deal with Iran as a nuclear power instead of taking a hardline position against the country. President Trump, however, and thanks to the support of Trump Christians, has a green light to even make war against Iran in the name of protecting Israel. 

The Gospel of Self is all over the relationship between the Christian right and Donald Trump. They helped elect a man with thoughts only of themselves and their relationship to the culture. Ignoring the red letters in the Bible, which charge Christ’s followers with care of the poor and the afflicted, these believers embrace the promises of a reprobate in the pursuit of their selfish gain. Pat Robertson was a Virginia aristocrat before he was anything else, and that backdrop forms the core of his politics. In his world, those who exhibit the worldly signs of success and happiness – primarily riches – are the ideal to which everyone should aspire. He preaches a form of good news that concerns believers not only after salvation, one that associates closeness with God to the blessings of possessions and ease in this life. Donald Trump personifies such a man, despite the immorality of his behavior towards women, his divorces, his bankruptcies, his language, his lies, and his overall character. 

But perhaps the biggest attraction that white evangelicals have towards Donald Trump is his willingness to pander to their wishes in turn for their support, especially in the areas of education, Israel, religious liberty, homosexuality, and, of course, the Supreme Court. It should be noted that each of these is a direct path to the Gospel of Self, for nothing the white evangelicals seek regards others; it’s all directed at making life better for those who imagine personal attacks around every corner from the unholy breed known as liberal progressives. “They” must be defeated! 

The Washington Post’s conservative commentator Mark Thiessen wrote5, “Trump has arguably done more in his first year in office to protect life and religious freedom than any modern president.”  

“Little wonder,” he added, “that religious conservatives stick with him despite the (Stormy) Daniels revelations. This is not to say that Christians don’t think a culture of fidelity is important. But the culture of life is important too. So is a culture that is welcoming to religious believers rather than waging war on them.” 

This motivator — the heartfelt belief that the Christian faith is under attack in our current culture — is one of the most important factors in Mr. Trump’s support. So persecuted are white Evangelical Christians by a rotting culture, the thinking goes, that we need to fight back with everything we’ve got politically, rather than just give the nation over to the devil by saying nothing. During his campaign, the President assured a drooling Christian right that “We’re gonna bring it back,” “We’re gonna protect Christianity,” and that “Christianity will have power if I’m President.” 

This issue of whether Christianity is under attack is complex and difficult to understand on every level. The parties involved have obviously differing views, but the arguments never really take place in the same contextual frame. One side argues that America was created as a Christian nation by Christians who came here to colonize in Jesus name, while the other side argues that such a belief doesn’t apply to the United States, because the country’s founders were an eclectic group and wrote documents to protect us from rule by religion. Moreover, the Christian nation argument is irrelevant in modern times, because humankind has come such a long way in the last few centuries. One is a spiritual argument; the other is an argument of reason. One touts Holy Scripture, while the other relies on education and knowledge. One is upstream with the saints of old; the other is downstream in a hundred human tributaries. One believes the Bible is a “living document” while the other sees a certain anti-progressive rigidity in a set of archaic rules. One claims to argue faith; the other claims to argue logic. One argues the Godly essence of justice; the other argues the Godly essence of mercy. These are opposites in human understanding, but the Bible teaches that God is equally both. To us, it’s a zero-sum view, and that is to our shame, for life is much bigger than our human minds can grasp. 

Any reasonable, objective study of early American history makes a convincing case that Christianity was so enmeshed in daily life at the time that one must conclude its governance and institutions were filled with people of faith. Arguing against this requires changing history, although there’s no real reason to do so. When English speaking people landed at Cape Henry Virginia in 1607, their very first act was to plant a cross and claim the land on behalf of their Savior. This act is significant in that everything that follows flows from it, including the documents that recognized the potential for mischief in taking such a proclamation too far. Hence, we have the establishment clause of the First Amendment. However, that doesn’t change the reality that the homes, by-ways, and communities of the colonies were filled with people of faith. Our democracy is based on oaths and promises that we make to each other, and there must be a form of personal punishment ahead for those who violate such, and it must be beyond what the law can provide. Hence, we swear to tell the truth by putting our hand on the Bible in courtrooms. Again, we can argue how effective it has been over the years, but this doesn’t alter the history behind it all. 

Moreover, any fair reading of early documents – including those of the Founding Fathers – can only be done using the language of the time, because the meanings of key words have changed over time. That means one must use the dictionaries of the era, Samuel Johnson’s classic of 1755 and Webster’s of 1828. When that is done, it takes considerable manipulation to conclude anything other than the truth of the claim that Christianity played a significant role in the formation of the U.S. It didn’t need to be specifically spelled out, because it was assumed at the time. This in no way means America was birthed as a theocracy, but rather a country based on the belief that government “of the people, by the people, and for the people” meant that those same people were already self-governed through their faith. After all, it was John Wycliffe who first uttered the phrase when, upon completion of the first common English language translation of the Bible, he said, “This book shall make possible government of the people, by the people, and for the people.” This is why those same founding fathers saw the need to include the establishment clause in the First Amendment. No single representation of God could never rule a people educated in the truths of the Bible. 

As the country has become more secularized, therefore, it’s been easy for Pat Robertson and other evangelical leaders to stir their followers over the actions of contemporary progressive thinkers. It forms the controversial pot within which the fundamentalists brew their self-serving anger demanding a return to the way it used to be. In this way, they became suckers for the flimflammery of a huckster in the 2016 Presidential election.  

And progressives have played right into this longing for the good old days by visible actions that offer evidence of an alleged conspiracy against Christians. For example, who authorized academia and government to change our most basic calendar headings from BC (Before Christ) and AD (Anno Domini – year of our Lord) to BCE (Before Common Era) and CE (Common Era)? There was no debate. No hearings. No input from others whatsoever. Suddenly, textbooks that our children used to study everything were printed using only BCE and CE, and all devout Christians could do was to loudly cry, “foul.” There are also the matters of School Prayer, the Ten Commandments, and the personal politics of gender. Is there a battle underway for the soul of the West? The answer is irrelevant, because the appearance of such a war is enough to make a political difference in the U.S. The fact, too, that progressives don’t feel it necessary to argue the grounds of these complaints is problematic, because the assumption that it’s unnecessary adds to the perceived arrogance that Christian conservatives use to argue their point. 

Like most things in life, this is not black and white, for it involves a great many other cultural considerations. Moreover, the strict “Christian Nation” crowd deserves its own blame for gutting the fatted calf it now wishes to protect. Besides, the more important matter is that even if we agree that America was birthed among people who practiced differing forms of Christianity, what are we to do about it today? The wise answer is nothing. 

Christianity is so divided into subsets that no one speaks on behalf of the whole. It’s just not possible. Each denomination makes a case why theirs is the path to righteousness and an afterlife in heaven. Therefore, there really is no such thing as the “Christian perspective” we used to espouse back in my days at The 700 Club. Is that the Catholic perspective or the Protestant perspective? Is it premillennial or postmillennial? Is it Pentecostal or reformed? Is it liberal or conservative? Black or white? Judeo-Christian or just Christian. You can see the conflict, which is why the establishment clause is there. 

Therefore, by self-division alone, Christianity has lost its influence on the culture, and the voice that’s complaining the loudest is the one that has the money and the resources to be heard, the white Evangelicals, eighty-one percent of whom voted for Donald Trump in the last election. And so Evangelical Christianity is the branch that is trying to drag us all in the direction of the theocracy the founders hoped to avoid. This is the group who has joined forces with the Republican Party – literally stolen the soul of the Republican Party – to “make” things happen that benefit their congregations and their point-of-view. Of course, the GOP of the Reagan era was quite happy to invite this crowd into its midst, never thinking it would produce what we have today.  

Think about it. For these people, God apparently doesn’t need our faith alone; He wants us to be a powerful political voice as well. This is the group that wants a war with Islam, because it leads to their premillennial one thousand years of glory in the name of Jesus. This is the group that needs Republican leadership in Washington to keep them tax free and thriving, so they can recruit support from the mountain top of the one percent. This is the group that wants their prayer to be in public schools, their self-centered gospel to govern programs for the poor, their self-righteousness to dominate human hearts when it comes to personal medical or relationship decisions, their way of life to be the norm and to frame the melting pot, their comfort to be the guiding light regarding who we allow into the pot in the first place, and their music, film, books, and art to be the only choice for all. 

As my friend Jeff Jarvis said, “Sharia Law? That’s nothing compared to Armageddon.” 

If there is but one truth about this particular group of Christians that should make us all wary, it is this: they will never be satisfied with just one victory in the culture wars. You can take that to the bank, and it represents the only tape that must be played out to the end for us to realize that – as a self-governing people – we cannot and must not let our guard down. The history of humankind is littered with the tragedies of those who fell for idolatry, the promise of magic, failure to take care of the poor and afflicted, and the fallibility of human nature. You want civil rights rolled back? Say nothing. Do nothing today. You want women to return to the status of chattel? Say nothing. Do nothing today. You want slavery brought back? Say nothing. Do nothing today. You want corporal punishment in the public square? Say nothing. Do nothing today. You want a culture dominated by fascist fear and bayonets? Say nothing. Do nothing today. 

From an historical perspective, there’s a great difference between a culture being overthrown and one that self-destructs, which is what’s really happening here. If, as the Evangelicals insist, they were the ones who built this country, then its collapse must be birthed in the same womb. You cannot claim leadership for the one without responsibility for the other. This is the major blind spot of those who argue that the devil or the liberals or the communists or members of any other group are at fault. Therefore, positing that Christianity itself is the victim here is utterly self-serving, and it’s also useless in trying to do anything about the evils around us. A slipping culture needs no outside help, if the ruling class within that culture cannot or will not accept responsibility for the slippage. 

The ruling class in America today, we must now conclude, includes certain powerful and vocal elements from within the entire Judeo-Christian Western hegemony. The nobility of yesterday has been replaced by panting thieves for whom license, not liberty, is the desire demanding to be fed. Thinking has been replaced by a mindlessness not found among past generations, who survived and even thrived despite having to solve real problems like slavery, sickness, world wars, and the rights of individuals. 

Those past generations wouldn’t recognize the Christianity that’s “under attack” today, which includes truly remarkable claims and warnings from diehard leaders.  

Author and Christian leader Mary Colbert6He (God) works through the ones he chooses. We don’t choose them. All we have to do is recognize them and when you recognize a chosen one and you have the discernment to know that they’ve been chosen and know that that’s the will of God, then your life will be blessed. And if you come against the chosen one of God, you are bringing upon you and your children and your children’s children curses like you have never seen. It puts a holy fear in me. 

Newsweek7The first Bible study group held for the U.S. Cabinet in at least 100 years is led by a pastor (Ralph Drollinger, a pastor and president of Capitol Ministries: an organization which aims to “evangelize elected officials and lead them toward maturity in Christ.”) who believes homosexuality is “illegitimate,” who doesn’t believe women should preach and has described Catholicism as a “false” religion. 

Prosperity Gospel Evangelist Kenneth Copeland8If Christians don’t support Trump, they are risking the wrath of God. Trump has been chosen by God, and by rejecting him, they are rejecting God. They could be punished with barrenness, poverty, or even having a gay child. 

The press generally doesn’t keep track of statements like these and that doesn’t help. As long as the press keeps religion — especially Evangelical Christianity — in its “Sphere of Deviance,” it will operate within a narrative that does not include the role of religion in the culture. This means the press operates outside the views of those for whom their faith is a working dynamic in their lives. This makes it impossible for reporters and commentators to ever figure out what really happened that put Donald Trump in the White House. They know nothing of the Gospel of Self. They’re willing to discuss issues important to Evangelicals, but they will always underestimate and minimize the importance of the faith’s role in history and especially current events. It’s simply not enough to cite ignorance and apply reason, when reason itself is a proclaimed enemy of the faith. The problem, then, is that both sides in the great American split are debating on different playing fields. It would be like the Dallas Cowboys playing the Philadelphia Eagles with the Cowboys playing in Dallas while the Eagles playing in Philadelphia.  

So important questions are left out of the discussion entirely, such as the matter of whether Donald Trump “belongs” in the White House. Did, as the Evangelicals claim, God put him there? Mr. Trump has been in office two years, and it’s gotten so that the only voices with good things to say about the man come from his own administration, a few extreme right-wing pundits, and the very core of his support, those white Evangelical Christians. He’s made enemies of the press, his own party, and two-thirds of Americans, but to those who practice The Gospel of Self, these are all to be tolerated in the name of a God who has heard the cries of his people and decided to save the country. The response of the press is a shrug and an “oh come on!” In other words, there is no response from those who don’t believe this other than that it’s laughable. By their inability or unwillingness to respond in kind, they are not playing in the same stadium as the Evangelicals. The Gospel of Self has taught Christians that they should be fighting in the political realm today for those who would restore righteousness to America and the world. And so, we go around and around in an endless series of meaningless echo-chamber debates, yelling and screaming. So, let us instead consider an argument that assumes the Evangelicals are right but alter the narrative just a bit. 

Perhaps God actually did put Donald Trump in office. Now, we’ve moved the game to Dallas, where the offenses and defenses of both teams can take the field. 

Sometimes, the most likely and obvious answer to the question of whether something “should” be is its existence, and this forms the essence of the right response to certain Evangelicals regarding the behavior of “their man.” Donald Trump IS the President, and to borrow the language of the faith, he’s there because he’s supposed to be there. 

We must remember that Evangelical Fundamentalist Christians take their cues from the Bible, which they believe instructs them on how to respond to the cultural shifts in front of them. They’re “mad as hell and aren’t going to take it anymore” when it comes to morality, jobs, taxes, security, safety, freedoms, and education. It’s no coincidence that these were the planks on which Trump campaigned, so it’s easy to understand their excitement with the candidate and now President. However, the Bible is filled with stories of people who stepped outside the will of God and were destroyed as a result. Therefore, let’s frame an argument that begins with an agreement that God put Donald Trump in the White House. The theological question then becomes why did He do that?  

If we can bring ourselves to ask this, it’s completely fair to then ask the question “what could be going on in the realm of the spirit in such a scenario?” The political Evangelicals – the ones who stole the soul of the GOP — think it’s to help them in their quest to fight against “sin” in the culture, to restore things to a time when life was supposedly easier or better. “Make America Great Again” fits this narrative perfectly. But what if the “sin” is within God’s own people? Could God be judging His own people and not the culture? Perhaps God is the One who’s mad as hell and isn’t going to take it anymore. Asking God — in prayer or otherwise — to judge the world can be a dangerous proposition, because God’s judgment, the Bible clearly teaches, begins with the “house of God,” His people. This view is prophetic and in line completely with the teachings of both the old and new testaments. We only need to look at what Ezekiel9 said about Sodom to find prophetic parallels to today: “Now this was the sin of your sister Sodom: She and her daughters were arrogant, overfed and unconcerned; they did not help the poor and needy.”  

Life destroys kingdoms that neglect their obligation to the poor and afflicted, and if that doesn’t bring a shudder to your spine, you have no conscience. This is exactly what’s taking place in America with the election of Donald Trump, and his policy decisions in the first two years of his administration prove it. The GOP – under the guidance and direction of white Evangelicals – has devolved us into the overfed, arrogant, and unconcerned culture that always precedes cultural destruction, and this – as Pat Robertson’s former executive producer – is my great fear today. On the other hand, it could be the time when we as a people rise up against it and proclaim a resounding “No!” 

Everyone knows there is a great divide between us in the West, one that life cannot tolerate forever, and perhaps that’s what the Trump presidency is all about. Could our current chaos be the very path for resolving the great divide in our midst? Frankly, if anything, that “divide” is contrary to what life could want from any of us, so again borrowing from the language of the church, perhaps this is what God is trying to show us. After all, how often does life lead us through our own difficulties by forcing us to deal with them over and over until we get it right? If Evangelicals can point to Sodom and its destruction (for homosexuality), then are we not able to use the argument above to refute that? 

The rise of Trump is a false promise to those extreme fundamentalist believers who “just know” that he’s right, because their church, their faith, and their families and friends all say so. It’s a false promise, because truth is one of those things that has a way of surfacing no matter how many times people try to hide it. Life’s way has always been to let humans do what we wish and watch as our efforts collapse. It’s the hard way, but it’s the way we learn as a species. Honestly, there’s no way we can avoid pain and suffering as this split continues. 

Our mistakes matter in our willingness to fulfill the potential of the human race. Could this be one of those times when we’re able to fix some of the big ones? 

Pat Robertson and those of us who labored alongside him in the 1980s nudged the country to the political right in ways that were more brilliant than devious. He sincerely felt and still feels, among other things, that the U.S. would be better off with teacher-led prayer in schools, the Ten Commandments back on public walls, abortion returned to illegal status, overturning the Johnson Amendment (prohibiting political involvement by churches), stopping the inflow of Muslims into America, and tax cuts that would permit the wealthy to give more to charities, including his own.  

In so doing, Robertson wrote the strategy for not only Republicans but also for other white Evangelicals, which is why Christianity’s brand is in so much trouble today. His influence cannot be overstated, because without the foundation laid by Robertson and The 700 Club, Donald Trump would never have been elected and the country wouldn’t be nearly so split as it is right now.   

The Trojan Horse Campaign of Tommy Tuberville

It’s Tommy Tuberville’s history to lose even when he wins. Witness his tenure at Auburn as head football coach. 85–40 in ten years. His team went undefeated in the SEC in 2004, yet didn’t play for the National Championship and was ranked second. You can argue all you want that this wasn’t Tuberville’s fault, but nobody really cares about that, least of all Alabama fans. The point is that Tuberville is a loser and the people at Auburn who fired him knew it.

From Tuberville’s Wikipedia entry: “he developed a reputation for losing games when he clearly had the better team.” I rest my case.

Let’s be real here, folks. The only reason this Trump bootlicker is the Republican candidate is Donald Trump’s hatred of Jeff Sessions. He has that same big smile and blank stare of all these Trumpchurian candidates around the country who gain by tickling the ears of supporters with false promises and religious appeals.

And now he’s wanting to take away the Senate seat of Doug Jones. Seriously? Let’s call this one like it truly is: Tuberville has sold his soul to the devil that is Donald Trump. He has nothing in terms of experience in government, one of those sham “qualifications” that Trump used four years ago to sell the idea that an outsider was needed to “drain the swamp.” Such a nice metaphor until you realize that replacing the swamp with quicksand is a net loss for everyone except the one percent.

What do Tuberville’s ads say? Nothing about him (obviously), only made-up nonsense to vilify Jones by laughably calling him a liberal. How do they make this claim? Well, it seems Jones has “friends” in Hollywood and has voted with such awful straw men as Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer. That makes HIM liberal, right? Wrong, and here’s the thing. Alabama knows that Doug Jones is a conservative Democrat and one of the very few in all of Congress to wear the label “deal-maker,” because he’s able to join with some across the aisle to actually pass legislation that is good for our state. This is precisely who we need in the Senate, not some handpicked Trojan Horse of the extreme radical right.

Tuberville is completely unqualified, because his lips move only with the words of his handlers from the Mitch McConnell wing of the Republican Party. He isn’t “for” Alabama. For crying out loud, the guy even lives in Florida. Oh, right. He moved to Alabama in 2018 for the express purpose of running for Senate. Does he, can he represent the wants and needs to Alabamians? Hell, no. He has zero knowledge of the problems of our state, and yet, here he is as Donald Trump’s candidate.

Like a great many local, state, and national Republican candidates, their vessels are the Trojan Horses of politics. On the outside, they appear to be one thing, but on the inside, they are seething with hatred for the poor and the afflicted (unless they can manipulate them for votes). Also on the inside they have no original thoughts, only the tried and true forms of propaganda that have nearly destroyed our country over the last four years through a conspiracy of the first order, as revealed in Anne Nelson’s book, Shadow Network: MediaMoney, and the Secret Hub of the Radical Right.

And, using national issues to justify local elections is sloth gone to seed. It robs people in states like Alabama from ever really addressing that which is important to Alabama. This is the exact formula that Sarah Palin used to gain office in Alaska, and who was her trainer? The 700 Club. This is exactly what we have in Tommy Tuberville. Of course he doesn’t have any ideas or plans, because he’s just there to parrot the wants and needs of the extreme right, and their attempted takeover of the U.S. Government. We need to repudiate this, and reject this blatant and self-centered attempt to fool genuine and otherwise wonderful country people into voting against their own basic needs in making what they believe is a righteous attempt to make a difference.

It’s the most egregious attempt to overthrow our government in the history of the United States. And, it’s done with a gleaming smile and charisma that hides a sleazy wolf in sheep’s clothing, to say nothing of the attempt to paint Doug Jones with a brush that belongs for use on somebody else. Doug Jones a liberal? You have GOT to be kidding me.

So, with work experience tagging Tuberville as a loser, he now wants to be one of Alabama’s U.S. Senators. His only qualification is that he’s a puppet of Donald Trump and Mitch McConnell. They say “jump” and he says “How high?”

And that, my friends, is not representative of anything other than the purest form of evil imaginable.

Deconstructing the “Vote for Trump” Arguments of the Christian Right

James Dobson may be a good preacher, but he’s a lousy human being for “leading” his flock astray in the name of what he believes to be a higher calling.

In case you missed it, Dobson has sent a lengthy letter to his followers to help justify them voting for Donald Trump in November, despite the relentless bombardment of the foul wind that has soured even the air we breathe every day of his “administration.” (Ed Note: you can find a link to the actual letter within the reference I’ve provided, but I will not link to it directly myself.)

There’s his total botching of the virus, his secret dealings with the Russians, his self-centeredness at the cost of hurting others, his lies about immigration, his tax boon to the 1%, the spectacular increase in the national debt, his disdain for people whose skin color isn’t white, his attacks on the mainstream press, his violation(s) of the Emoluments Clause of our Constitution, his unstable mental state, the fact (yes, fact) that he’s intellectually challenged, and most of all, that he’s a loser and always has been, a snake-oil salesman from the Wayback Machine.

And yet, here is Dobson — one of the Christian Right’s most beloved leaders — telling us that none of it matters, that he needs our votes, so that Dobson and those of his ilk can fully overthrow the U.S. Government and take control of the United States on behalf of Jesus. Don’t believe me? Read Anne Nelson’s powerful book, Shadow Network: Media, Money, and the Secret Hub of the Radical Right and argue with her documentation of this Christian Conspiracy.

I’ve got to be honest here. This is the greatest threat to the wellbeing of the U.S. since the Civil War. Here’s just one section of Dobson’s rhetoric:

Disengaged people won’t lift a finger to preserve this great land. They won’t take even a few minutes to go to their polling places to vote. There are also thousands of pastors who won’t allow voting registration tables in the lobbies of their churches. Don’t they know or care that America is on the ropes? Hordes of angry anarchists are salivating over the next election, hoping to push America over a cliff. If they succeed, as Newt Gingrich said, Western civilization will never recover. Is there anyone left who believes some things are worth dying for?

This kind of language is highly manipulative, for it begins with a false witness, that America is on the ropes with “hordes of angry anarchists” salivating over the next election. Seriously?

People smarter than him and with more money than him are taking advantage of this entire shadow government that the Christian Right has been plotting and building. These Silk Stockings really don’t give a ripple chip about what’s contained in Dobson’s apologetic; they just need their votes. I promise you, this will not end well for those who believe as Dobson does.

So let’s examine the “seven critical issues” that Dobson uses as justification for voting, once again, to keep a damaging reprobate in office.

The Next Generation — This is number one, because it fits his narrative. Moreover, it tickles the ears of his older followers, and he knows that they care deeply about their progeny and their legacy. What better way to hook people than to talk about their children and grandchildren in light of that which hasn’t happened yet. James Dobson may think himself a prophet, but lies like this are certainly NOT prophecy.

“Make no mistake, the left and secular culture are manipulating the minds of your sons and daughters every day of the year.”

With respect, Dr. Dobson, isn’t that precisely what YOU do? You watch a Super Bowl halftime show starring Jennifer Lopez and “just know” that it’s harming those poor, impressionable kids who were really there just to watch a football game. In whose reality is this true? Only yours, sir, and when you work to make that vision real, you remove any opportunity for adults to talk with their children, which appears to be something you’d rather do for them.

The Sanctity of Human Life — Here, Dr. Dobson trudges out the tried and true. Using the worst possible statistic — that more than 60 million “babies” have been murdered since Roe v. Wade in 1973 — Dobson et al continue with the hypocrisy of describing themselves as “Pro-Life”.

“This is the most tragic holocaust in the history of the world! Some states have even passed laws allowing wounded and suffering infants to lie alone on porcelain trays after somehow surviving unsuccessful abortions. They will die without the comfort of their mothers’ breasts. If that doesn’t touch your heart, you are without compassion. I hope you will not cast a single vote for any politician who supports such wickedness.”

I’m so tired of this worn out piece of propaganda, mostly because it’s been used to vilify a great number of good people who didn’t and don’t deserve it. Moreover, to use this narrative to hook followers by calling pro-choice people “pro-abortion” is all the evidence I need as a human being to question the motives here. I mean, Dr. Dobson, God doesn’t need you to stretch the truth (there’s that darned 9th Commandment again) in order to advance your political agenda. This is a case where the evidence doesn’t justify the accusations, because the abortion rate has been shrinking to the point where it’s BELOW the rate when Roe v. Wade was originally passed. Dobson and his cronies are stuck in the 1980s, when their quest for political power first moved into high gear.

Marriage and Family — The divorce rate among Americans is dropping as younger people are deciding to wait for better financial security. You’d think this would be great news for people like Dobson, but it’s actually a threat. Remember the Shirky Principle, that institutions need to protect the problem for which they are the solution. And, this means despite the evidence. Dobson will never view marriage and divorce statistics through any lens other than the one he borrowed from Chicken Little.

“…listen carefully: powerful and highly funded forces, including LGBTQ and other leftist entities, are determined to destroy the family as an institution. It is already on its knees, and its future is grim. Before you vote, find out what position the candidates have taken on this issue. Then vote accordingly.”

Fear is always behind so-called Christian appeals for money. Oops. Sorry. I forget to tell you that this letter is also about fundraising.

Religious LibertyOMG, this is THE most disturbing issue of all, because it’s a sneaky bit of slight of hand. At its core, this argument is about raising the influence of James Dobson and the rest of his kind. What good is a religious approach to governing, if you don’t have the legal means necessary to accomplish it? Hence, of all the issues that Dobson touts, this one is THE most self-serving. What these people want is license to do as they please, regardless of the effect on anybody else. To even use the word Liberty in this euphemism is claptrap of the highest magnitude.

“The courts have done the greatest damage, but now an entire sub-culture is trying to bring down the Christian faith. Whether it has invaded your private world or not, it is at your front door…
…Don’t let the government close the doors of your church or tell you when you can sing praises to the Lord Almighty.”

Seriously, this man is deluded, but his prose is highly manipulative, like all the other propagandists who came before him. Religious Liberty is a fallacious “issue” because it’s really not an issue; it’s what these people need in order to pull off their overthrow of the U.S. Government.

Capitalism v. Socialism — Yeah right. How about we tag this euphemism for what it is: an appeal to greed and avarice versus loving your neighbor as yourself. Haven’t we learned by now that capitalism requires a governor, that it cannot be left to the extreme money-makers, because they will always default to profit? Even their philanthropy needs to be examined, because generosity at that level is more an annoyance and a tax write-off than it is genuine concern. Of course, there are exceptions, but those shouldn’t force us into the manipulation of people like Dr. James Dobson. Don’t listen to these convenient phrases, because they have no basis in truth but are a regular staple of extreme conservatism. And what comes after socialism? The great boogieman in the sky Communism. You’ll hear that this year.

“It is difficult to believe that for the first time in American history, our nation appears to be thinking about trading our democratic way of life for the tyranny of socialism. I can hardly catch my breath.”

Sorry, Doc, but you’re going to need more than your own words to prove this, because it’s simply untrue. It is, however, a convenient painting for the brushstrokes that he’s providing. The extreme religious right doesn’t have the chops to back up this piece of propaganda, but it matches so well with Republican Party tactics that it doesn’t matter to them, and especially to James Dobson.

Three other things. One, notice he uses the cover-your-ass words “appears to be.” Dead giveaway. Two, the 1% comprise a major chunk of Dobson’s operating revenue. Three, it’s simply evil to take study results and provide your own interpretation, as Dobson does with this sentence: “Is it true that up to 40 percent of millennials and others are prepared to surrender their liberties in exchange for the absolute authority of the state?” Sorry, folks, this guy’s own words convict him. Too slick. Too sleazy.

The Judicial System — Here, Dr. Dobson gets to the heart of the whole matter, his absolute justification for voting for four more years of the Trump holocaust. The extreme righties demand a Supreme Court that does their bidding, so they’ve created this straw man to force their interpretations of how our judicial system works onto the public and hopefully force their way into our business.

“But again, and again, they have overstepped their authority and brought us atrocities such as abortion on demand, same-sex marriage, and the so-called “separation of church and state,” which doesn’t appear in the Constitution.”

Finally, I know these people. They will never stop at a conservative majority, because they want to force their beliefs and practices on everybody else. Abortion, after all, isn’t really about killing babies; it has always been and will remain a form of birth control to them. And, if you think about it seriously, you’ll realize it’s really all about sex. They have a very rigid formula for sex and birth control, so don’t be fooled. This is why they so steadfastly argue for judges who “don’t make law,” whether it’s necessary or not. All they want is THEIR way.

The Nation of Israel - I’m glad Dobson saved this one for last, because it’s personal for me. The United States GIVES Israel $1,000,000 every single day, holidays and weekends included, without any strings attached, only that it be used for defense. Against whom? They are already THE malicious bully in the Middle East, killing grown ups and children with impunity in their quest to claim all the land from the Jordan River to the sea. The Israelis are masters at propaganda, and American ears hear only that.

“Scripture tells that those who bless Israel will be blessed (Genesis 12:3). Our prayer is that the next Chief Executive Officer of the U.S. will continue to promote and cultivate a vibrant bond of friendship with the nation of Israel, which is our only ally in the Middle East. Anti-Semitism and all forms of racial discrimination are inherently evil, and we condemn them categorically. We are a nation that is dedicated to ‘freedom and justice for all’ ”.

Into this apartheid political mess in the Middle East come the Christians with their love of Holy Land Tours and admonitions from their leaders that Israel can basically do no wrong, because GOD is with them permanently and in perpetuity. Really? My son-in-law was among the Palestinian people forced to relocate to Jordan by the Israelis in 1967. His views are so much more believable than the stuff that flows in church about Zionist Israel. And, of course, they wield the antisemitism label without challenge, so as to silence their critics. A million dollars a day. Imagine what we could do at home with that money. And, then there’s this “only ally” assertion. If the political situation was different, do you honestly think the Arabs wouldn’t do business with us?

There’s also the regular criticism of Islam as an “enemy” of America. We should instead be asking, “Why are these people so angry?” That presupposes, of course, that we can get past the propaganda of the oil industry to actually consider it.

All of these “faithful” men and women are overcome with a thirst for power under the sun, and if I can reference Ecclesiastes, that is only vanity. It’s a temporal power, but one these people believe they are owed by their dedication to what feels to them like a righteous calling.

It’s all bullshit! And, here’s my summary. Vote for the candidate you think deserves your vote, hopefully for one that will relieve us of this unrelenting nightmare. There’s serious blood on your hands if you don’t.

Editor’s note: I got all the way through this without once mentioning Fox News. Aren’t you proud of me?

Deconstructing the Sacrosanct Faith of Others

“For we walk by faith, not by sight.”

One afternoon while working at my desk overlooking the campus of the Christian Broadcasting Network, one of our 700 Club story producers knocked and asked if he could borrow a camera. He wanted to have one of our Vice Presidents interview him about his hand. This fellow had lost one of his fingers to an accident in the past, and he had spoken with this VP about God and his missing finger. They agreed such an interview would be useful to have in order to document the missing finger. You see, he wanted it on hand to use when God grew the finger back, because he “believed” that was God’s plan for him, or at least that it might be.

This may seem laughable to some, but it was seen as a reflection of the reporter’s faith, and questioning someone else’s faith was tantamount to a great evil among Christians of a certain variety. After all, the warning is there in Matthew 18:6 “But whoever causes one of these little ones who believe in Me to sin, it would be better for him if a millstone were hung around his neck, and he were drowned in the depth of the sea.” (NKJV)

I saw this reflected in letters Pat had sent to some questioning viewers. He used it to “edit” the program. For example, we were guided not to show fat people on-the-air, because it might lead others into sin. I saw it in the horrifying letter I received from a man in Pennsylvania — a member of a faith community — whose 10-year old daughter had died from cancer (because they wouldn’t take her to a doctor). Worse, he told me, than her death and suffering was the abandonment she felt from God, because everybody on The 700 Club got healed, so why not her?

I’ve written before that this letter was a major influence on my decision to first leave CBN and go back into local news. I couldn’t argue with our position on faith — it was an unspoken pall that existed just above the surface of every facet of CBN and the ministry of Pat Robertson. If somebody else believed, who were we to question it? It was our justification for reading “praise reports” on the air as they came in via phone calls from our counseling center without verification. It was to inspire people to great faith, even though roughly 9 of 10 of these praise reports were completely false. Who cares if they’re simply “claiming” a blessing ahead of time? It’s THEIR faith, and we cannot question it.

Yes, we are to never, ever challenge the faith of another believer, even if their claim is far beyond the rational. After all, it wouldn’t be “faith” if it was rational, right? After all, anything’s possible with God, right? And their claim must be held sacrosanct, for it’s a terrible sin to interfere with another person’s faith. Besides, we have laws against intolerable behavior towards another person’s faith. That’s in the first amendment, right? The actual word is religion, and faith can mean that, too.

So what IS this thing called “faith” anyway? I believe that it’s the evidence of a life in Christ, which is natural, a life lived in the moment, absent the anger and resentments of the past and the fear and anxiety of the future. This is the subject of my newest unpublished book, Life on Life’s Terms: The Remarkable Secrets of People of the Moment. I feel so strongly about this that it has become a regular part of my study.

Common phrases like these all speak to faith as what one “believes”: “I’m believin’ for a miracle — I’m believin’ for a new purse — I’m believin’ it’ll all be over soon — I believe I’m goin’ to Heaven — I believe in her — I believe that chair will still be there, when I get back — Y’all better believe that was God! — She believed all her life.” Therefore, is this thing called “faith” about what we believe? Many Christian teachings lead to that conclusion. There’s Hebrews 11.1 “Now faith is the assurance of what we hope for and the certainty of what we do not see.” This entire chapter is a Biblical history lesson about faith, and the important thing to notice is that each involves an action.

There are many commentators with views on this subject. Here’s one:

The Bible says that faith gives substance to the things you hope for. In other words, faith brings those things into your life. … The basic definition of faith, according to the Bible, is simply believing in God’s goodness and believing that He rewards the people who seek after Him.

A lot of people would “Amen” such, but the Bible also teaches that belief isn’t faith unless it’s accompanied by some attached work or effort or assistance to the creation as a whole. Read James, people. What’s that you say? Luther called James ‘the epistle of straw’? It may be straw, but it’s still an Epistle, right? I mean, really. Who was Martin Luther anyway? I’m sorry. Nope. It’s not enough to just believe; one must be involved in some act associated with that belief in order to accurately call it faith.

This is best exemplified by an exchange between the disciples and Jesus found in Luke 17:5–10. It’s a familiar — but often misinterpreted — piece of scripture. It begins with the Disciples asking Jesus to “increase our faith.” This timeline follows the teachings in Matthew 18 about causing others to stumble. That’s important, because the disciples certainly didn’t wish to be in that category. Besides, they were human, and it’s reasonable to add a parenthetical phrase to their question (“Lord, increase our faith, so that we can do the things that you do”). Jesus understood their ego was involved in the question, so He responded with two parables.

The first was the mustard seed. “If you had faith like a grain of mustard seed, you would tell this sycamore tree, ‘Be uprooted, and be planted in the sea,’ and it would obey you.” Nowhere in the Greek text is there a reference to the size of the seed. Hence, a tiny amount of faith has nothing to do with the question. It’s an all-or-nothing proposition. Jesus says, “If you have faith like a grain of mustard seed…” He tells them the mustard seed has faith — absolute faith absent the ability to say no — and if they had similar faith, they could toss mountains and trees into the sea. However, this is followed immediately by the parable of the unprofitable servant, which tells them that even with such a power, they (we) are all still absolutely nothing in comparison to God. This is a giant stumbling block for many believers who think that all they need is a tiny bit of faith in order to move mountains or get to Heaven. Nonsense. It’s also a powerful reminder of the price we’ve all paid for the fall.

(I'm reminded of Joni Mitchell singing, "We've got to get ourselves back to the garden.")

So, now let’s return to the initial question, “If somebody else believed, who were we to question it?”

Can you see how easy it would be to plant a suggestion in the mind of that believer, and for them to run with it? Take the average person’s daily struggle to get by, aided by faith that it’ll all work out in the end, no matter what. The church promises to give them hope through fellowship with other believers in such a way that it internally validates this person’s beliefs. “I’m among others who believe,” is a comforting justification for going along with the group. Add to this the heresy that God wants his children to prosper in every way between the present and Heaven’s gate, and there’s little others can do — no matter how much love they give — to help this person understand the self-centered nature of their thinking.

This person — and a great many others just like them — needs to have their faith challenged, not embraced as fresh meat for the grinder of religion. Religion needs fresh meat, because every believer that dies of old age means a loss to that place of worship, especially in terms of resources.

Today, the church has been swept up in the same lies that the ego has been preaching for centuries, that the culture can be theirs, if they’ll only bow down and worship their own ability to pull it off.

These people believe THEIR faith is enough to view Donald Trump as King Cyrus from the Bible. Cyrus was a reprobate foreign king that God used to send the jews home after years of captivity, and these Christian groups who supported Trump believe that they could simply speak this preposterous comparison into existence. Such is the license granted to anyone who cites religion as their motivation to manipulate the public square. It doesn’t have to be true — in fact, in many ways it’s better that it not be true. It simply needs to be stated as a statement of faith, something they’ve been taught not to question.

The true extent of the evil in our presence today won’t be known for at least a generation, and it’s because this idea of “believing faith” has deep roots within my generation and older. I call on young people everywhere to challenge their own assumptions vis-à-vis what it means to be a person of faith. There is an incomparable hope to those people who live in the moment and surrender to life on life’s terms.

That’s what it means to walk by faith and not by sight.

The Ongoing Hoax of Fox News

Senator Doug Jones
Will the Alabama press paint Doug Jones as a liberal?

Let’s try this again.

Observers of the press in 2020 can be excused for their misrepresentation of Fox News, because it flows from their predictable understanding of the news business: that stories in the press rightly contain the many voices representing the issue being examined. That the mainstream even regards Fox as part of today’s news ecosystem is a significant error, for Fox News doesn’t fit the news paradigm, because its behavior represents itself as a mouthpiece for the political right. Despite its “Fair and Balanced” slogan, Fox News has no need to represent other views, because the “balance” it allegedly supplies is juxtapositioned against the purported bias of the mainstream press as a whole.

Everybody got that?

This is exactly what we did in the 1980s at The 700 Club. We positioned ourselves and our bias as on the same level as everybody else in the press, but with one huge exception. We, like Fox, felt we were providing the “balance” that the mainstream refused to provide, because they were biased in favor of liberalism. The latter, of course, was routinely proven false, but propaganda has no need of or respect for the truth.

Read these next words VERY carefully. The news business is based on what’s new, which includes both ideas and practices within our generally progressive/evolving culture. It’s not rocket science to understand that the word “news” involves that which is new. Those who only wish to protect the status quo certainly have voices within the framework of reporting something “new,” but those voices don’t have the authority to present people simply doing their jobs as representing their political opponents. This is very useful for the extremists, who need to present the press as an outside agitator or key facilitator of the evil they boast about defeating.

This forces the mainstream press into a box convenient for the political right, because the press can do nothing but play defense. It’s especially the case when the right drags out the “fake” news paintbrush. Logical fallacies abound, but there’s nothing the press can do about it, so long as they wish to be called the press.

And, here’s where the thought line gets murky, because professional journalism has its own deception to deal with, one that clouds everything regarding the press in 2020.

We used to think those many voices could be presented within individual stories. Balance, we called it. Fairness. All “sides” included in stories relevant to these varying voices. It was known as “objectivity,” the gift of Walter Lippmann’s “professional” journalism of the early 20th Century. That’s right; it’s only 100 years old.

However, as historian Christopher Lasch so brilliantly noted in his 1990 essay “The Lost Art of Political Argument,” thus began the detachment of the people from the political process. As this professional press grew, involvement in the political process by Americans declined, and not only that, but another consequence was we lost our ability to form arguments. The press did it for us, and this was viewed as progress.

Read further into Lasch’s essay, however, and you come across the real intent of all this, which was to create a sterile environment for the sale of advertising. That’s right. Commerce giants didn’t want their brands soiled by acquaintance with dirty politics, so Lippmann’s views became mainstream. Moreover — and this is the important point — it empowered the tactics of public relations, as envisioned by Lippmann’s Creel Committee cohort, Edward Bernays.

Bernays, a nephew of Sigmund Freud, had sneaky and psychologically-based ideas about how a small group of men (this was 100 years ago) could manipulate public opinion through what he called “propaganda.”

“The conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic society. Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of our country. We are governed, our minds are molded, our tastes formed, our ideas suggested, largely by men we have never heard of.”

Propaganda, by Edward Bernays

The ideas of propaganda have been with humankind for several centuries, but it was the space created by the professional press that boosted it to prominence. After all, the essence of mass media is that a single entity can reach great throngs of people, and the 20th Century — with its industrial revolution — was a great test tube for experimenters like Edward Bernays. His access to significant resources (such as money from the tobacco industry, one of Bernays’ initial clients) allowed him to manipulate mass numbers of people.

So the effort to position right-wing propaganda against the mainstream press was really just clever public relations, because these deliberately biased organizations don’t really belong within the body of what we know of as “the press.” This is likely fine with the perpetrators of this false witness, because it served the special interests — a.k.a. the aristocracy, a.k.a. the silk stockings, a.k.a. corporate masters — in their wishes to escape government regulators or cultural responsibilities to the communities they serve. “Noblesse oblige” has gone the way of the Dodo bird, for today’s aristocracy is only interested in themselves.

I will quote John Milton at every turn: “License they mean when they cry ‘liberty’.”

As Pat Robertson taught me, “If I’m playing the position of fullback, and the announcer calls me a halfback, that’s not MY fault; it’s the ignorance of the announcer.” This kind of thinking, we believed, gave us license to call ourselves whatever WE thought was proper. So, the heck with those pesky announcers (cultural observers).

It’s also easy to understand that the press is exasperated with this turn of events, because it’s gone beyond a case of simple political positioning; the radical right is exceptionally skilled at propaganda and no longer wishes to be just a “side” in some observer’s reporting. No, their clear “want” is to always be the player with the most marbles and to keep others (meaning those who are different) out of their inner ring. Call it racism, xenophobia, classism, or whatever you wish, but an economy that serves only the top 1% simply isn’t sustainable absent a bayonet at everybody else’s back. And that, my friends, isn’t liberty; it’s totalitarianism. No wonder Donald Trump envies Valdimir Putin.

Here in Alabama, the demonizing of Conservative Democratic Senator Doug Jones has begun, and his race for the Senate against newly-minted candidate Tommy Tuberville (a former football coach at Auburn, of all things) has all the earmarks of a unilateral attack on the character of a real servant of the people. What qualifies Tuberville? He supports Donald Trump and was a way for him to get revenge on Jeff Sessions for what Trump believes was a betrayal. They’re trying to present Jones as a liberal, which is hilarious to those who pay attention, and it’ll be very interesting to view how the Alabama press responds. I think we already know what Fox “News” will present, as well as the many lesser known Fox wannabes that exist here.

That’s how it goes with propagandists, those bearers of false witness demanding license for the 1%.

I’ll keep you posted.

BONUS LINK: The Underlying Fallacy of Fox News